IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Latino Pulse: How Did Clinton, Trump Do in 2nd 2016 Presidential Debate?

Our Latino experts weigh in on the second presidential debate after a stunning weekend that had Trump reeling over a 2005 video.
Image: Candidates Hillary Clinton And Donald Trump Hold Second Presidential Debate At Washington University
Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump arrive for the town hall debate at Washington University on October 9, 2016 in St Louis, Missouri.Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

The debate began without a handshake. The eyes of the nation were on presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as they sparred for an hour and a half in their second debate after a stunning weekend in presidential politics.

Who scored points, who had some disappointing moments, and did they make their case to prospective Latino voters on their abilities to run the country? We asked our panelists for their thoughts on tonight's debate.

Trump Denied Being a Predator, Then Promises to Jail Clinton

Stephen A. Nu?o
Stephen A. Nu?o

ST LOUIS, Missouri - The devolution of this campaign season has been surreal to watch in real time. One cannot understate the historical significance for our democracy when a presidential candidate who denies being a sexual predator goes on to threaten his (female) opponent with jail. This will be talked about as a defining moment for years to come. Beyond the entertainment value of this debate, I sat in the press room at Washington University watching as the media gasped in disbelief at Trump promising to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton and later saying he would put her in jail.

It was sad to see Trump receive a question about healing national wounds over Islamophobia and respond with an answer that was essentially Islamophobic, stoking false narratives about refugees and immigrants. Trump continues to play the same hand he began his campaign with last year.

RELATED: Trump's Pledge to 'Jail' Clinton Unprecedented

As an educator and a political scientist, I did not think this was not a good night for our democracy. Once again there was little discussion on student debt, our immigration problem, on economic policies beyond the tax codes readily available to the upper strata of society. Trump was incoherent during much of the debate when he tried to talk about anything of substance, talking about a different policy on Syria than his vice presidential candidate. He even seemed sedated at times. Clinton's strategy seems to be to allow Trump to speak as much as possible when he loses control. Rather than engaging Trump, she seems to have calculated, correctly I believe, that Trump's greatest weakness is Donald Trump.

Like each performance Trump has been a part of in this campaign, whatever value the Trump folks think they gained from this moment will rapidly deteriorate in the phalanx of news rooms now adept at picking his lies apart by placing them side by side with the almost endless film on Trump saying the exact opposite of his many false assertions and accusations. For her part, Clinton remained mostly calm and confident, despite her visible frustration in trying to keep up with Trump's many detours from reality.

Stephen Nuño is an Associate Professor in the Department of Politics and International Affairs at Northern Arizona University and an NBC Latino Contributor.

Trump Spoke to Base, Clinton to Independents

Victoria Defrancesco Soto
Victoria Defrancesco Soto

The presidential candidates weren’t just speaking past each other at the second presidential debate, they were speaking to completely different audiences.

Donald Trump had his base as his sole target and he hit the bull’s eye. There was no effort by Trump to win over undecided voters or even establishment Republicans.

In contrast, Hillary Clinton was seeking to lock in undecided voters as well as reel in establishment Republicans that have abandoned Trump either in the last 48 hours or earlier. Each candidate won their respective audience hands down.

Over 13 million voters supported Trump in the primary elections. For the most part these are individuals who have a deep dislike and distrust of Clinton and like Trump’s street fighter style. He danced with the one that brought him.

Trump began the debate by deflecting on the sexually lewd tape of him by turning to accusations of sexual misconduct of former President Bill Clinton. Trump then gave way to personal attacks on Clinton. Throughout the debate Trump would say “she lies” which is minor compared to him stating early on that Clinton should be sent to jail. And just to get under Clinton’s skin, Trump threw in a remark about him seeing evidence that first lady Michelle Obama has not said nice things about her.

Trump did not pull any punches. But then again we knew that was going to be the case before the debate when Trump hosted a Facebook Live panel with women who have accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault.

And in terms of policy (or the few policy questions that were snuck in) Trump remained elusive on details and stuck to common talking points.

Clinton desperately wanted to appeal to the ever-shrinking base of Independents through both her substance and style. The style portion of it was the hardest given that she was visibly upset at various points in the debate and struggled to keep her cool. However in the end she did keep it together and then pivoted to detailed policy propositions such as on health care, taxes, and the situation in Syria.

Twice Clinton highlighted her 30-year career, highlighting the work she has done with various groups – children, the disabled, Latinos, etc. She wanted to make sure the voting (hiring) public knows that she has the professional experience. She also threw in her ability to work across the aisle and touted her relationship with former President George W. Bush after 9/11 – a little catnip for anti-Trump Republicans looking for a home.

It wasn’t pretty, but Trump did what he needed to do as did Clinton. To say that either presidential candidate won outright would be comparing apples to oranges. But, in the end, this debate wasn’t about a “general” American public but rather very specific sub-segments of them.

Victoria Defrancesco Soto is a contributor to MSNBC and, as well as a regular political analyst for Telemundo.

Trump Failed the Essential Test of Tonight's Debate

Image: Raul Reyes
Raul Reyes John Makely / NBC News

Latinos had clear reasons to tune into Sunday’s presidential town hall with interest. Like other Americans, we wanted to see whether Donald Trump could manage any semblance of damage control for his recently-revealed lewd comments. Also, consider that Latinos have managed to figure prominently in the post-debate conversations. Remember Alicia Machado, and “That Mexican thing?”

Unfortunately, this debate disappointed on several levels. Latino voters cite the economy, health care, and education as their top priorities. But only health care merited substantive discussion, as HIllary Clinton reminded viewers of the ways in which she believes the Affordable Care Act has worked, while Trump simply promised “great coverage” for everyone. And once again, there was no discussion of immigration reform.

Clinton stayed wisely on message with her mentions of everyone with whom Trump has feuded, from Judge Gonzalo Curiel to the Khan family, and she ably articulated various policy positions.

Yet it must have been frustrating for her to “debate” someone with so little command of the issues. Trump went so far as to threaten to have Clinton jailed if he were elected president, which indicates a fundamental lack of understanding about our judicial system (it's illegal to use the law to go after your political opponents). In addition, he falsely stated that, for minorities, the education system is “a disaster” and “jobs are essentially nonexistent,” two points that are contradicted by data.

In what can only be seen as another reason for Latinos not to vote for him, Trump stated that he would like to see a Supreme Court justice like Antonin Scalia – a justice who consistently voted against civil rights, affirmative action, and voting rights. Noted.

The big question of the night was whether Trump would make a full apology for his lewd comments. His defense that it was all “locker room talk,” along with his pivot to past allegations against Bill Clinton, were ineffective.

Noting less than a full apology was called for, and he did not offer one. On these grounds alone, he failed the essential test of the evening.

On a personal note: As someone who has been involved with sports and athletics my entire adult life, I would like to point out that men do not speak that way in locker rooms. Occasionally, boys may. Men do not.

Raul Reyes is an NBC Latino contributor, attorney, journalist and TV commentator.

Follow NBC News Latino on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.