IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Bachmann's confusion bubbles over

Dorsey Shaw noted late yesterday that Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) has had a "horrible, no good, very bad week." It's true -- even by Bachmann's awful standards, the ignominious congresswoman has had it rough lately.

Her CPAC speech was ridiculous, and left in tatters by fact-checkers. Asked for an explanation, Bachmann literally fled from a reporter confronting her with her own words. Bill O'Reilly invited her on to get back on track, but when Bachmann refused, he turned on her.

This, however, was the moment that arguably mattered most.

"Let's repeal this failure before it literally kills women, kills children, kills senior citizens," Bachmann said on the House floor. "Let's not do that. Let's love people. Let's care about people. Let's repeal it now while we can."

I'm sure this probably makes some sense to Bachmann, but for those of us living in reality, it's just crazy.

She went on to say, "What [President Obama] demanded and insisted upon is that the government have 100 percent control over health care," Bachmann said. "100 percent control? The American people lose control? What did they get? They get health care -- health insurance, I should say -- that is more expensive than anything they've ever paid for before. And they get less for it. Well what a deal, Mr. President, Mr. Speaker. What a deal."

For anyone with a rudimentary understanding of the issue, this is complete gibberish. Under current law, government doesn't have "100 percent control over health care," but rather, private insurers have a key role providing coverage for tens of millions of people. What's more, consumer costs are lower, not higher, and they have more expansive coverage, not less.

It's almost as if Michele Bachmann, after having been caught saying ridiculously untrue things, has no qualms about making matters worse, bringing a new round of shame to her and her constituents.

Of course, she can at least take some comfort in the fact that the House Republican leadership kept her on the House Intelligence Committee, inexplicably giving this deeply strange and unhinged lawmaker access to the nation's most sensitive, highly-classified secrets.