IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Republican groups sue California over expanded mail-in voting

A GOP official called the state's effort "radical" and a "recipe for disaster that would create more opportunities for fraud."
Image: An election clerk inspects a mail-in ballot
Beverly Darm, an election clerk at the Sacramento County Registrar of Voters, inspects a mail-in ballot in Sacramento, California, on May 30, 2018.Rich Pedroncelli / AP

The Republican National Committee and other GOP groups sued California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Sunday, arguing that a move to expand mail-in voting during the pandemic is illegal.

The suit, filed in federal court in the state's Eastern District, also names the California Republican Party and the National Republican Congressional Committee as plaintiffs.

In a tweet announcing the suit, Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel called Newsom's executive order "radical" and a "recipe for disaster that would create more opportunities for fraud."

His May 8 order requires election officials in each of the state's 58 counties to send mail-in ballots to all registered voters.

"No Californian should be forced to risk their health in order to exercise their right to vote," Newsom said.

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

Republicans in other states have echoed an assertion from President Donald Trump that-in mail ballots are "dangerous" and "fraudulent."

Experts who study the issue have found no evidence that voter fraud is a widespread problem in the United States.

In a separate lawsuit filed in Texas last month, a federal judge ruled last week that state Attorney General Ken Paxton had offered no evidence when he made the same claim in an effort stop the Texas Democratic Party and individual voters from expanding mail-in voting.

"The court finds the Grim Reaper's scepter of pandemic of disease and death is far more serious than an unsupported fear of voter fraud," the judge, Fred Biery, wrote.

Biery ruled in favor of the local Democratic Party, although the order was put on hold after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to review the case.