IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Trump pardons father-and-son ranchers who set fires on federal lands

The president's granting of clemency sends a message about federal overreach on Western lands.
Dwight Hammond Jr.
Rancher Dwight Hammond Jr. greets supporters outside his Burns, Oregon, home on Jan. 2, 2016.Les Zaitz / AP file

President Donald Trump on Tuesday pardoned father-and-son ranchers from eastern Oregon who were convicted of setting fires on federal lands.

Dwight Hammond Jr., 76, and Steven Hammond, 49, were convicted of setting a fire in 2001 that consumed 139 acres of federal land, according to the Justice Department, which said the blaze covered up evidence of their illegal deer hunting. Steven Hammond later set a second fire in 2006; they were prosecuted for both fires in a 2012 jury trial.

The pair were in prison in California. Lyle Hammond, Dwight Hammond’s son, said Tuesday that both had been freed, according to the Associated Press. Online federal court records did not immediately show they were released. A person who answered the phone at the correctional institution would not confirm they had been released.

During their trial, the Hammonds argued that the mandatory minimum five-year sentences were unconstitutional. The judge agreed, and they were sentenced to three months for the elder Hammond and a year for his son. They completed their sentences and were released, but the Justice Department appealed their reduced sentencing.

In late 2015, a second judge ordered the father and son back to prison to serve out the full five-year sentences, with credit for time already served. That second imprisonment spurred outrage in their community, which argued they had already served their time.

"This was unjust," the White House said in a statement from the press secretary, calling the appeal "overzealous" and the evidence used to convict them "conflicting."

The elder Hammond has served already approximately three years, according to the White House, while Steven Hammond has served approximately four years in prison to date.

Image: A sign shows support for the Hammonds on Jan. 5, 2016, in Burns, Oregon
A sign shows support for the Hammonds on Jan. 5, 2016, in Burns, Oregon.Rick Bowmer / AP file

"Justice is overdue for Dwight and Steven Hammond, both of whom are entirely deserving of these Grants of Executive Clemency," the White House statement said in a statement.

Some ranchers have protested federal ownership and control of lands in the West as federal overreach, and Trump's pardon is a sympathetic nod to those who share that view.

Their second imprisonment sparked a protest in Burns, Oregon, and later an armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge led by brothers Ammon and Ryan Bundy, sons of Cliven Bundy, the ranching family that disputes federal ownership of land their cattle grazes on.

When the Bundy family refused to pay the $1 million in unpaid grazing lease fees and fines in 2014, federal authorities intervened and sparking a weekslong armed occupation there.

The Hammonds said they did not ask the Bundys for help, but the Hammond's case was seized upon as a sign of federal overreach. Ryan Bundy said in a 2016 interview with NBC News that the Hammond family's case was "an example of the terrorism that the federal government is placing upon the people."

Former federal prosecutor Dwight Holton, the U.S. attorney who wrote the indictment against both men, told NBC affiliate KGW of Portland Tuesday that "the Hammonds were serial arsonists who stole from US taxpayers for years."

"They resisted all efforts to get them to knock off their pillaging of public lands, and were ultimately found guilty of serious felonies," he said. "That and that alone finally put a stop to their crimes."

"The President's use of the pardon power as a political tool is dangerous in the extreme," Holton told the station. "It's the kind of thing tin-pot dictators do, not American presidents. It's a bad day for Justice."

The Hammond family said in a statement that they are grateful to Trump, and they agree with the president’s characterization that the government’s appeal was "overzealous." The family said it has already spent $400,000 related to civil damages in the matter, in addition to the prison time.