IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Judge orders a redacted version of the Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit be made public Friday

The document lays out the justification for DOJ's search of former President Donald Trump's Florida estate. It's unclear how much will be redacted.
Get more newsLiveonNBC News Now

WASHINGTON — A redacted version of the affidavit used to secure the search warrant for former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate is set to be unsealed Friday under a judge's order.

The Justice Department submitted its proposed redactions to the document on Thursday, prompting the judge to agree to unseal the document on Friday by noon.

The search warrant affidavit had led U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart to find probable cause that evidence of crimes would be found at Mar-a-Lago ahead of the Aug. 8 raid. The document lays out the justification for the Aug. 8 search of Mar-a-Lago by FBI special agents, though it is unclear how much will be redacted.

Reinhart had earlier indicated that he might not release much, if anything, of the underlying search warrant affidavit, and the Justice Department had opposed its release. In a ruling Thursday afternoon, Reinhart wrote that the department had shown sufficient cause to redact portions of the document, saying that releasing the affidavit in whole would reveal the identities of witnesses, law enforcement and "uncharged parties," as well as the scope and methods of the investigation.

Further, the Justice Department had shown that its redactions were "narrowly tailored," Reinhart wrote.

Some documents related to the search warrant have already been released, showing that a number of classified documents had been found at Mar-a-Lago. Under the law, Trump was not supposed to possess any presidential records, which are supposed to be under the control of the National Archives. The affidavit would reveal more of the justification for the search and some of the evidence that the government presented to the judge.

Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley noted that the department had “filed a submission under seal per the Court’s order of Aug. 22,” but declined to comment further “as the Court considers the matter."