Defense closing argument: Prosecution must prove case beyond reasonable doubt, Chauvin 'does not need to prove his innocence'
05:08
During his closing argument in the Derek Chauvin trial, defense attorney Eric Nelson focused on the legal principles "presumption of innocence" and "proof beyond a reasonable doubt." He explained that Chauvin does not need to prove that he is innocent, the jury must reach a verdict solely based on the case that was presented by the prosecution.April 19, 2021
UP NEXT
Derek Chauvin asking for retrial in George Floyd murder case
02:47
Derek Chauvin files appeal in George Floyd murder conviction
00:31
Four ex-officers involved in George Floyd’s death to be arraigned in federal court
03:17
4 ex-Minneapolis cops to be arraigned on federal charges related to George Floyd
00:27
Chauvin prosecutor asks judge to modify sentencing memo to acknowledge witness trauma
02:17
Derek Chauvin sentenced to 22.5 years in prison for George Floyd’s death