Traffic is so bad along the eastern rim of Los Angeles’ suburban ring that regional planners are considering the once unthinkable — an 11-mile tunnel through a mountain range in earthquake country.
Critics question the logic of building a multibillion-dollar project in a region so prone to earthquakes that an alternate proposal for a double-decker highway was deemed too dangerous. The tunnel would begin barely a mile from a fault that produced a 6.0-magnitude earthquake about a century ago.
“It’s absolutely absurd to have a tunnel 700 feet below ground in earthquake country,” said Cathryn DeYoung, mayor of Laguna Niguel and a vocal opponent. “I mean, would you want to be in that tunnel?”
Planners are due to make a decision in mid November on whether to pursue the project.
The proposal for what would be the world’s second-longest road tunnel would create a new path between sprawling inland suburbs and Orange County, which has become one of Southern California’s fastest-growing job centers.
Such a project could cost up to $9 billion and take 25 years.
Transportation officials insist something drastic must be done to deal with the crippling traffic congestion between Orange and Riverside counties, which are separated by the 25-mile-long Santa Ana Mountains. Nearly 400,000 people commute into Orange County daily from four surrounding counties and nearly all of them drive.
Region faces traffic crunch
California Highway 91, the only major road connecting Riverside County, where homes are more affordable, to jobs-rich northern Orange County carries 268,000 cars a day, nearly 50,000 more than it was built to handle. Officials expect that to increase over the next 25 years to nearly a half-million cars per day.
Howard Gottesman, 44, can spend 1½ hours on Highway 91 to travel just six miles from his job as a property manager in Orange County to his home in Corona, just inside Riverside County.
“I call it the longest six miles in the world. It’s wear and tear on the car and it’s wear and tear on me,” said Gottesman. “They need to do something, whether it’s double-decking the freeway or tunneling under the mountains. We need relief.”
Planners for Orange and Riverside counties have spent the past 18 months and $15 million in federal funds studying the issue. A committee of local and regional officials is expected to choose elements from three main alternatives by Nov. 18. Two of those alternatives include a version of the tunnel. Selecting a tunnel option would trigger years more of studies.
As currently conceived, the four- or six-lane tunnel would make up more than two-thirds of a 15-mile corridor connecting Interstate 15 with two toll roads in central Orange County.
Seismic threat a ‘major concern’
The tunnel would rank second in length to Norway’s 15-mile Laerdal Tunnel, which opened in 2000, said Michael Litschi, spokesman for the Orange County Transportation Authority. There are longer railroad tunnels, including the 33.5-mile Seikan Tunnel in Japan and the 31.3-mile Channel Tunnel linking England and France.
Litschi said engineers were waiting to see if the committee chooses the tunnel option before doing more studies on the Lake Elsinore fault system, but acknowledged that seismic activity is a “major concern.”
Local officials have worked closely with a British engineering company that has helped build some of the largest tunnels in the world and has concluded that the tunnel is “viable and feasible,” said H. Tony Rahimian, a consultant who helped devise the tunnel proposal.
“A tunnel is actually a very safe place. We don’t want to run it through the faults and we’re going to avoid that,” he said.
Many critics say a tunnel will never suffice and suggest more mass transit.
“Every study shows that you can’t build your way out of congestion,” said Karl Warkomski, mayor of Aliso Viejo, in southern Orange County. “Eventually, you’re going to get a point where you’re back to square one — where we are now, or even worse.”