IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

'Engaging' on foreign policy -- after the election

Associated Press

Mitt Romney has assembled quite a few advisors on foreign policy, many of whom worked for the Bush/Cheney team, and given the former governor's inexperience and limited understanding of international affairs -- Swiss bank accounts don't count as proficiency in this area -- those who have his ear are getting a closer look.

With that in mind, the New York Times reports today that many members of Team Romney disagree with one another -- and at times, even the candidate -- about foreign policy, and occasionally, Romney's own advisors have no idea what he's trying to say.

On Afghanistan, for example, Romney's advisors support negotiations with the Taliban, as do most U.S. military leaders. The candidate, however, instead boasted at a GOP debate, "We should not negotiate with the Taliban. We should defeat the Taliban." A Romney advisor conceded, "none of us could quite figure out what he was advocating."

Similar problems have come up when Romney has talked about Iran, China, Russia, and nuclear proliferation -- he contradicts himself and his advisors, who in turn contradict one another.

So, how would Romney operate in his capacity as leader of the free world? Apparently, he'll figure that out a year from now.

"There are two very different worldviews in this campaign," said one adviser who aligns more often with [John] Bolton. "But as in any campaign, there are outer circles, inner circles and inner-inner circles, and I'm not sure that anyone knows if the candidate has a strong view of his own on this." Another adviser, saying he would be "cashiered" if the campaign caught him talking to a reporter without approval, said the real answer was that "Romney doesn't want to really engage these issues until he is in office."

How reassuring. Neither Romney nor his team has a coherent vision on foreign policy, despite a multitude challenges around the globe, but once the former governor is the president, then he'll "engage these issues."

In this case, Romney isn't being secretive so much as he's being lazy -- he hasn't bothered to give international affairs a lot of thought so far, and he doesn't feel the need to do so now.

About a month ago, Romney said President Obama's campaign strategy is to "re-elect him so we can find out what he will actually do.... Unlike President Obama, you don't have to wait until after the election to find out what I believe in -- or what my plans are." Looking back, it was one of the more ironic things the Republican has ever said.