IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Hospital emergency rooms try to cut wait times

It’s the sort of promotion you might expect from a pizza delivery chain, not a U.S. hospital system. With competition for healthcare dollars tight and complaints about care on the rise, hospitals from California to Virginia are trying to cut wait times.
/ Source: Reuters

It’s the sort of promotion you might expect from a pizza delivery chain, not a U.S. hospital system.

Like the pizzeria that picks up the bill for taking too long, a Kansas City hospital offers cinema passes and a Detroit hospital system gives away major league baseball tickets to patients who wait half an hour for emergency room service.

With competition for healthcare dollars tight and complaints about care on the rise, hospitals from California to Virginia are trying to cut wait times. They pitch “quality care at a moment’s notice” and “door to doc” treatment in minutes.

For those who do endure long waits, hospitals offer meal vouchers, baseball and movie passes and written apologies.

“If someone has to wait a long time it is less likely they’re going to come back,” said Deborah White, spokeswoman for Carondelet Health, which owns two acute-care hospitals in Kansas City that launched a “30-minute guarantee” program on June 1, even as a competing hospital chain pledged to see patients within 15 minutes.

More than 113 million emergency room visits were reported in 2003 nationwide, up from 90.3 million in 1993, according to the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. As visits climb, so do wait times.

In a 2006 report, the Institute said backlogs cause ambulances to be turned away from emergency departments once a minute on average and patients wait sometimes hours or even days for a bed.

Last month a 43-year-old woman died in the waiting room of a Los Angeles-area hospital emergency department after a perforated bowel was not treated swiftly.

‘Culture change’
“I’d say one quarter of the nation’s emergency rooms are doing this now,” said American Hospital Association spokesman Rick Wade. “Over the next five years you’ll see this pretty much everywhere except in the smallest hospitals.”

A typical urban hospital emergency department handles tens of thousands of patients a year. Doctors and nurses must often juggle patients with life-threatening injuries with those whose ailments include ear infections and sprained ankles.

Patients typically require a mix of services, such as X-rays or blood tests, and medicine from the pharmacy.

Hospitals historically kept track of a progress with handwritten charts passed among care-givers and departments.

But with the new focus on efficiency, electronic tracking boards report on patient status. Physicians type their orders into databases directly, allowing for faster handling of the ill and injured.

“There was a lot of resistance in the rank and file of physicians at first. They thought it was basically a marketing ploy,” said William Berk, vice chief of emergency medicine for one of seven hospitals in the Detroit Medical Center system, which saw 300,000 emergency department patients last year and just completed a total system streamlining.

“It was an enormous culture change,” Berk said. “But it has had a very real positive effect on patient care.”

Some hospitals are moving to eliminate waits altogether. The Adventist GlenOaks Hospital in Illinois promises no waits at all. As of last week, patients could skip the waiting room and go directly to a private room where treatment starts as registration is done bedside.

“Nationwide we are doing poorly with the emergency system and its ability to handle surges. But if hospitals can streamline their information, they can see more patients,” said Bharat Sutariya, a former emergency department physician on staff at Kansas City-based Cerner Corp., which develops healthcare technology.

“It helps the patients and can lead to financial gain for hospitals,” said Sutariya.