IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

'Hardball with Chris Matthews' for Friday, February 6th, 2015

Read the transcript to the Friday show

Date: February 6, 2015
Guest: Marie Harf, Michael Weiss, Rory Kennedy

CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Dying for humanity.

Let`s play HARDBALL.

Good evening. I`m Chris Matthews in Washington.

"Let Me Start" tonight with news that the last known American captive
of ISIS, 26-year-old humanitarian worker Kayla Mueller -- today, ISIS said
she was killed in an air strike, buried in the rubble of a building. The
United States has not confirmed that claim at all.

Mueller is from Arizona. There she is. She was taken hostage by ISIS
in August of 2013. Until today, her name had been kept quiet at the
request of her family. The news comes the same week ISIS released a video
showing a captured Jordanian pilot being burned to death while trapped in a

For more, I`m joined right now by NBC`s Keir Simmons, who`s in Amman,
Jordan. Keir, thank you so much for joining us. I -- personally, I got to
tell you up front that however she died, if she died, she died as a victim
of her captors. They captured her. They put her in a spot where she was
killed. I don`t care what cover-up story they`ve got.

But what evidence do we have now, hard, right now about what happened
to this wonderful person?

KEIR SIMMONS, NBC CORRESPONDENT: Chris, you`re right. And really,
what ISIS are trying to do, whatever the truth is, in making this
announcement is they`re trying to really kind of shift the blame onto the
Jordanians, onto the U.S., onto the coalition.

But let`s just be absolutely clear. It was ISIS that captured her and
held her hostage, if the facts of all of this are true, and the facts are
not easy to be sure about. I mean, the Jordanians, Chris, are describing
this as part of ISIS media propaganda, criminal campaign. And they are
saying here that they can`t be sure that she has, indeed, been killed or
how she has been killed (INAUDIBLE)

In ISIS, you are talking about a group that beheads innocent hostages,
as you point out, that killed the Jordanian pilot by burning him to death.
They say, How can you believe anything a group like this says?
Particularly when an announcement like this, by them at this point, when
the Jordanian public seem to be swinging behind the Jordanian government
(INAUDIBLE) how can you, they say, that believe group, when it seems so
convenient for them to make this announcement now?

MATTHEWS: It`s more than convenient. I think it makes sense, their
motive, if they`re lying completely, to blame whatever they did to this
young woman, they can blame on the Jordanians and try to cause division at
home in Jordan, anything to try to take it -- to exploit the horror of
their own killing. They put this person in a situation where they`re going
to be bombed, and then they blame it on their enemy to hope to cause
confusion in the ranks on the other side. It`s just as I think you put it
so well.

Do we know how many more -- what is the next prospect fro them to grab
another victim? Do we know if they have any potential to reach into, for
example, Turkey and grab a tourist or a missionary or a business person?
What`s their reach like?

SIMMONS: Well, they do have a reach, Chris. I mean, with any
organization like this, be it a criminal organization or a terrorist
organization, what we know is that there are layers. So there are the hard
core, violent hard core, if you like, and then beyond that, there are
people who either explicitly or tacitly support that group.

Now, I was in Turkey just recently on the Syrian border, and we knew
that there were ISIS supporters along that area, and if (ph) known, too,
for example, in Lebanon. That will be the case here in Jordan, too, which
is a -- by far a majority Sunni Muslim country and has a long history,
Jordan, by the way, of tackling and confronting Sunni extremism, jihadism.

So yes, they have a long reach. You really hope that what you
described there doesn`t happen, but once again, you see ISIS attempting to
use an innocent hostage in order to further its own propaganda aims.

And I will say one thing, though, Chris. I mean, in a sense, it also
suggests that ISIS is under pressure, that they are having to resort to
more and more extreme propaganda, if you like, more and more extreme
actions because these air strikes, by some accounts, do appear to be having
some effect, albeit ISIS still holds Raqqa, still holds Mosul in Iraq.

MATTHEWS: OK, thanks so much, Keir Simmons, for that report, in
Amman, Jordan.

For now, I`m joined right now by Marie Harf, who`s deputy spokesperson
for the State Department.

Marie, this young woman -- I have to show the picture again. I mean,
this gets to everyone`s hearts in this country, a young person, really not
having seen much of the world yet, except what she is seeing is on her road
to help people, whether it`s in Israel or in the Palestinian territories or
in India or back in Arizona working with HIV victims. I mean, all she`s
done, it seems, since she got out of college, is do good. That`s it. No
politics, no personal aggrandizement. She didn`t go out to get famous or
anything. Just -- we never heard of her until this horror.

be clear we have nothing at this point on our end, in the U.S. government,
in the intelligence community, to corroborate these reports today. We`re
looking into it. We`re looking into whether we even thought some of these
targets the Jordanians hit where hostages had ever been held. So there`s a
lot of unknowns tonight. So I want to be very careful before we get ahead
of the story.

But you`re right. The people ISIL`s targeted we`ve seen --
Journalists, aid workers, people from around the world who just wanted to
help the Syrian people, burning alive a fellow Muslim. And I think that`s
why you`ve seen on the Jordanian side such resolve in their response, on
our side, on everyone else`s side.

And I really think they are trying to use this for propaganda value,
and that`s why the rest of the Muslim world and the rest of the world has
stood up and said, This does not represent us and this cannot stand.

MATTHEWS: Yes, I think if we hadn`t been through the idiocy of Iraq,
we`d be going to war with them right now on the ground. Anyway, that`s my
view, we`re so angry about this.

But shortly before her capture, Kayla told a local newspaper, "For as
long as I live, I will not let this suffering be normal. I will not let
this be something we just accept. It`s important to stop and realize what
we have, why we have it and how privileged we are, and from that place
start caring and get a lot done." So she was committed here.

Let me ask you about -- do they have -- I raised this with Keir
Simmons, who`s a reporter, a correspondent, with you or (ph) at the State
Department. Do we have any knowledge of their reach? Same question. Can
they keep doing this? Can they keep plucking Americans or Westerners or
targets of any kind out of missionary stations or churches or anywhere, or
business groups in Turkey, on the border? Can they grab more people?

HARF: Well, certainly, the most dangerous places, as we`ve said from
the State Department, is Syria and Iraq. And these are places we want
journalists to be able to cover.


MATTHEWS: We have people there, don`t we? Aren`t there all kinds of
people there?

HARF: In Iraq, certainly. We don`t have a diplomatic presence in
Syria anymore. But we want aid workers to get in there because they need
the aid. And we want journalists to get in there because these stories
need to be told. So we have very serious travel warning in place because
there is a very serious threat in Syria, along the border with Turkey and
in Iraq, and people are at risk if they go there, unfortunately, to tell
the stories that these people need told to the world. But it is very
dangerous, very dangerous.

MATTHEWS: Tell me about the passions. I mean, you work at the State
Department. It`s about world diplomacy. It`s about public diplomacy.
What is the right American attitude that you guys -- Richard Stengel and
other people over there, which you do -- what do you want the American
people to feel?

Because I feel like I`d like to zap ISIS from the planet. I don`t
want them on the same planet with me sometimes. And yet I understand the
politics, that we`re not in the mood in this country to launch another
ground war, to go in there with 200,000 people, the bugles blowing, and
some popular general leading the way. It doesn`t seem like anybody wants
to do that. Even John McCain, the superhawk, won`t do that.

So what is the appropriate emotional response that you`d like to see
Americans have?

HARF: I think you can do both. I think you can say we are going to
directly take this fight to ISIL. We`ve done that. American bombs are
falling on ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq, and with our partners. But
we`re doing it in a strategic and a smart way. I think all of our hearts
break when Americans overseas are held, when they`re taken hostage, but we
know that we need to lead.

I mean, you look today, the national security strategy we just
released -- I know it doesn`t get a lot of headlines, but it talks about
American leading from the position of strength and strategic patience and
strategic goals that we have here. And it`s not about shooting from the
hip. You`re exactly right. It`s not about sending combat troops in. It`s
about where are our interests at stake, how can we best go after them, and
sometimes it`s about taking direct military action, and we`ve done that in
Syria and in Iraq now.

MATTHEWS: Well, you`ve said it well. Thanks so much, Marie Harf of
the State Department. Thanks for joining us.

Michael Weiss is an editor of "The Interpreter" and author of the new
book, "ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror." So Michael, what`s going on in
their heads over there, to do these horrible things like pouring gasoline
on a guy, a soldier, a soldier, a serving soldier of his country doing his
duty, to pour -- oh, I don`t want to think about this too much. But there
it is. And now taking whatever happened to this young woman now, who is
totally innocent -- I mean, not even a warrior. They don`t seem have
anything but hate going for them.

understand, Chris, you know, we in the West think of ISIS as a sort of
ragtag bunch of peasant terrorists, 14-year-old boys from Tunisia going off
to do jihad. This is a complete misapprehension. The people in the upper
echelons of this organization, almost to a man, have experience in the
regime of Saddam Hussein. They were Mukhabarat officers, meaning special
security services. They were Iraqi military. They were Iraqi military

What this tells us -- what this tells me, anyway -- is these are guys
who were trained by the Soviets, including the KGB, at all forms of warfare
-- conventional warfare, guerrilla warfare, and indeed, information
warfare. Now, the video -- the awful, gruesome immolation of the Jordanian
pilot -- that`s actually a 22-minute-long video.

Most people are focused on the horrifying denouement of him going up
in flames, but the first two thirds of that video is an extraordinarily
adroit and sophisticated propaganda piece directed against the state of
Jordan. They are showing Jordanian airplanes dropping bombs counterposed
with images of dead Muslim babies. And they`re basically saying -- and
this goes to the kind of heart of their jihadi ideology -- Jordan is an
apostate, illegitimate regime. This is not the true Islam. The true Islam
is embodied by ISIS, and these are Muslims killing other Muslims.

Now, you and I watch this and think, I mean, this is just terrible,
awful propaganda, and again, it ends in the death and horrifying murder of
this young man. But to jihadists, this is quite, intoxicating. And you
know, ISIS`s relationship with Jordan goes back decades. Abu Moussab al
Zarqawi, the founder of Al Qaeda in Iraq, he was Jordanian. The guys
brought into Iraq from Afghanistan, he training them up in an Afghan
training camp funded by al Qaeda. A lot of the guys he brought with him
were fellow Jordanians.

You know, the Jordanians let this guy out of prison in 1994 as part of
a general amnesty coinciding with King Abdullah`s ascension to the throne.
They know this group extraordinarily well. That`s why they have people
from AQI in their prisons that they`ve just hanged in retaliation for this.

So ISIS preying upon that vulnerability. They`re preying up on that
sort of inherent weakness, I think, in the coalition. A lot of the Arab
countries that are on board or that have been up to this point feel this is
not the right strategy. You can`t...

MATTHEWS: OK, you haven`t gotten to the point of why do they butcher
people? Why do they burn them alive? Why do they behead Japanese? What
have the Japanese ever done to them? I mean, what has that woman ever done
to them?

You haven`t gotten to the point of their willingness to let ideology,
whatever it is, supersede any morality or any humanity. So what is it
justifies their behavior in a way that`s almost beyond religion? Anything
we do, as evil as it is objectively...

WEISS: Right.

MATTHEWS: ... is good because it furthers the causes of what? So
it`s not about the smart politics vis-a-vis the Jordanians and the
Hashemite kingdom. What is it in their souls that says anything goes?
What is it?

WEISS: To their mind, and what they`re trying to sell to the world
and to their recruits is that these people are all complicit. They belong
to crusader or Jewish conspiracy regimes. If they`re from Japan, fine.
Japan is giving money and helping out with the coalition in some manner.
If they`re a Western or American journalist, well, you come from, you know,
this great infidel nation, and you`re paying taxes which goes to a war
machine and all that. It`s propaganda.

Look, I mean, the brutality -- I have to -- I have to emphasize this.
This -- you know, the imaginative (ph) brutality of ISIS -- this is
actually nothing new in the Middle East, Chris. I mean, Bashar al Assad`s
regime has done this. They`ve set people alight. They`ve done even worse.
Saddam Hussein used to throw dissidents into bags with feral cats as a form
of torture.

The difference with ISIS is they advertise it. The publicity is the
thing. And actually, I hate to say it, they are counting on the West to do
their bidding for them. I always say ISIS is -- sort of wants to be the
Western news editor. That`s their kind of kind of function in propaganda.
So we`re -- we`re sitting here, talking about this awesome, you know -- I
should say horrifying brutality. Again, this is going to lead to
recruitment. They are going to swell the ranks of their...


WEISS: ... organization because of what they`ve just done.

MATTHEWS: Well, none of what you said is good news, but it`s what you
say and you know what you`re talking about. Thank you very much, Michael

Coming up, meet the 2016 pander bears. This week, Chris Christie,
Rand Paul and even Bobby Jindal all took their turns pandering to the far
right, performing like dancing bears at the right-wing circus. And for
Christie, a bad week just got worse, with his administration facing a new
criminal investigation.

Plus, when President Obama denounced ISIS and all who kill in the name
of religious, he also said Christians have used religion to justify evil,
like during the Crusades and slavery. And those comments made at
yesterday`s National Prayer Breakfast triggered a holy war, if will you
from, the hard right. Lots of expected reaction to that.

And the presidency in black and white. How has President Obama done
when he`s had to confront the tricky issues of race in his own country?
It`s been front-page news lately. We`re going to see how he`s handled it.

Finally, "Let Me Finish" with this sad rush to placate the enemies of

And this is HARDBALL, the place for politics.


MATTHEWS: The New Hampshire primary, as we said this week, is just
about a year away, and a new Granite State poll from WMUR and the
University of New Hampshire shows Jeb Bush now on top. The former Florida
governor gets 16 percent of the vote, 5 in front of Wisconsin governor
Scott Walker. Chris Christie, Rand Paul and Mike Huckabee are all tied in
third with nine apiece.

And we`ll be right back.


MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL. The 2016 Republican pander bears
are on the loose. This week alone, Bobby Jindal, Chris Christie and Rand
Paul took turns proving there`s no pander they won`t pursue to win favor
with the hard right. Bobby Jindal made opposition to Common Cause a litmus
test for being a true conservative. Here he is.


GOV. BOBBY JINDAL (R), LOUISIANA: This Common Core fight, we are
going to sometimes have people that we agree with on other issues fight us
on this. And the Common Core fight`s a great example that if we`re really
sincere and authentic and if we`re true conservatives in terms of what that
means, we have to be for empowering individuals, especially parents when it
comes to raising their children.


MATTHEWS: Never mind that in 2012, not a million years ago, Jindal
himself praised his state`s adoption of Common Core standards, which he
said would, quote, "raise expectations for every child." Complete pander

Then there`s Rand Paul. He made vaccines sound like a risky bet in a
CNBC interview.


SEN. RAND PAUL (R), KENTUCKY: I`ve heard of many tragic cases of
walking, talking normal children who wound up with profound mental
disorders after vaccines. I`m not arguing vaccines are a bad idea. I
think they`re a good thing. But I think the parents should have some
input. The state doesn`t own your children. Parents own the children, and
it is an issue of freedom.


MATTHEWS: That`s a pretty clear statement of cause and effect, don`t
you think? But Rand Paul tried to clean up his statements after this.
Quote, "I did not say vaccines cause disorders, just that they were
temporarily (sic) related. I did not allege causation. I support
vaccines. I received them myself and I had all my children vaccinated."

Well, then there`s the great, big pander from Chris Christie, which
came in answer to a question from our own Kasie Hunt. Here he is.


KASIE HUNT, NBC CORRESPONDENT: Do you think Americans should
vaccinate their kids? Is the measles vaccine safe?

GOV. CHRIS CHRISTIE (R), NEW JERSEY: All I can say is that I -- we
vaccinate ours. So you know, that`s the -- the best expression I can give
you of my opinion. You know, it`s much more important, I think, if you
think as a parent than what you think as a public official. And that`s
what we do.

But I also understand that parents need to have some measure of choice
in things, as well. So that`s the balance that the government has to
decide. It depends on what the vaccine is, what the disease type is and
all the rest. And so I didn`t say I`m leaving (ph) people the option.
What I`m saying is that we have to have that balance in considering
parental concerns because no parent -- no parent cares about anything more
than they care about protecting their own child`s health.


measure of choice in things as well. So, that`s the balance that the
government has to decide.

It depends on what the vaccine is, what the disease type is, and all
the rest. And so I didn`t say I`m leaving people the option. What I`m
saying is that you have to have that balance in considering parental
concerns, because no parent -- no parent cares about anything more than
they care about protecting their own child`s health.



Just to be clear, in that one sentence, he went around the bend there.
He said he didn`t believe -- he believed in a measure of choice for parents
whether to vaccinate their kids, but he also said he didn`t believe in
options. Figure that one out. If anybody can figure out that, they`re
really interesting to listen to mentally.

Anyway, that`s one pander one there.

Joining me right now is an expert on this, Steve Kornacki, host of
"UP," and MSNBC political reporter Kasie Hunt.

I want to start with Kasie because you really started this sort of
week of pandering. You asked him I thought a pretty direct question: What
do you think of requiring vaccinations for things like measles? And he
seemed to give two answers. One, I want parents to have the option, but I
don`t believe in having an option for the parents.

I didn`t get it.

KASIE HUNT, NBC CORRESPONDENT: In some ways, he was trying to have it
both ways.

I would also point out though that this is something that Christie has
actually dealt with as governor for a long time. New Jersey has had over
the years some strict rules about mandatory vaccinations. And so there`s
been for a long time this community of parents that are concerned. And
Christie dealt with them a lot when he was running for governor.

And what he did as kind of gave his stock answer on this, which is to
say on the one hand, they`re good for my kids, but the government shouldn`t
be mandating them.


MATTHEWS: But then he said no options.

HUNT: But I think it`s -- look, I think it shows you the difference
in context, right, and how hard it is, even when you`re the governor of a
very large state who stood on this national stage in many ways, to go from
that stage to being potentially on a presidential one. That`s what he set
himself up as.

MATTHEWS: What you`re really saying is, it`s one thing to govern New
Jersey and understand a state that has a pretty clear East Coast mentality
and is for vaccinations generally, with some exceptions, to go out into
crazy country where it`s become an ideological issue, an ideological issue.

Let me go to Steve.

This is to a lot of people like fluoride in the water was back in my
day, where fluoridation meant the communists are manipulating our minds
through the water or they`re forcing us to accept sort of socialization of
the water we drink. The ideological factor is what makes this hot, just
like Common Core, which we will get to.

Everything now in the Republican Party you have to measure between
established scientific thinking and then you have to go all the way over to
the other end, the one idiot and say, well, how about those who don`t like
established scientific thinking and you have got to square that circle
every single time. As Kasie just said, you have got to meet all these
concerns in one answer, which is what you heard right there from the
dancing bear himself.


I mean, if you`re Chris Christie and you`re interested in running for
president and being president, you have to worry, you`re saying, about the
Republican base. And whatever the fixation happens to be of your party`s
base, you have to be really responsive to that.

I think with Christie, though, what is interesting and it`s
particularly true because there`s so much built-in suspicion among the
Republican base when it comes to him. He has less sort of a margin for
error to begin with as he communicates to them.

But it`s so interesting to me watching Chris Christie for years and
listening to him right now. More than most politicians, I think, Chris
Christie is really selective and really knows how to turn it on and off
when it comes to seeing gray.

He has all of these moments where you can think of them, where it`s
like get the hell often the beach, or where he stands up for a Muslim judge
in New Jersey, where there`s black and there`s white and there`s absolutely
no in between. He really makes a name for himself by coming down and
taking firm stands, and that`s where he gets this reputation for straight
talk and for telling like it is and all that stuff.

And it`s so interesting to contrast that with what you just heard
there, where suddenly when it comes to, like, well, the general electorate
is over here and the Republican electorate or parts of the Republican
electorate are over here. And so he tries to put himself somewhere in the
middle. I think where he gets himself into trouble is, that`s particularly
jarring for him, because people are so accustomed to the so-called
straight-talking, plain-talking Chris Christie.

MATTHEWS: This is how Hillary Clinton got in trouble when she was
doing in the Drexel debate last time around and she had to keep Eliot
Spitzer happy with his giving driver`s licenses to people not here legally
and the Hispanic community happy and also keeping the general electorate
happy that didn`t like any of that stuff going on.

She got caught in that. This is called, anyway, getting in the
middle. Anyway, Jeb Bush back in December this past year said Republican
candidates had to be willing to lose the primary in order to win the
general, which would basically involve not pandering. Let`s listen to Jeb.


Republican can win, whether it`s me or somebody else, and it has to be much
more uplifting, much more positive, much more willing to, you know, to be
practical now in Washington world, lose the primary to win the general,
without violating your principles. It`s not an easy task, to be honest
with you.


MATTHEWS: Nor is it to any of these candidates, Kasie. They tell
you, I`m going into the valley of death. I`m going to take a loss in Iowa,
maybe a loss in New Hampshire, maybe a loss in South Carolina, but
eventually I will reach the reasonable middle-of-the-road Republicans and
win this thing.

That`s a heck of a gamble.

HUNT: It`s a really nice thought to be able to do this, to sort of
set out. And I think you heard his speech in Detroit. He did try to do

He talked all about the right to rise. He cast -- he didn`t offer
really any policies that are necessarily different than what other
conservatives have offered over time, but the way he talked about it was
different. I just -- it`s going to be an interesting test when the rubber
hits the road whether or not that`s going to stand up in the face of
attacks from all of these other Republicans day after day after day.

Can he be joyful? I think anyone who`s ever run a presidential
campaign will say that it is unusually anything but joyful.

MATTHEWS: Thank you, Kasie Hunt. Thank you, Steve Kornacki.

Brilliant, as always, you two.

You can watch, by the way, Steve tomorrow morning at "UP." Get up
early on Saturday morning here on MSNBC, with special guest Alex Trebek.

Up next, the Academy Award-nominated documentary the "Last Days in
Vietnam." Filmmaker Rory Kennedy joins us next, and she`s nominated for
best picture, best doc.

And this is HARDBALL, the place for politics.


MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.

By March of 1973, American ground troops had finally left South
Vietnam. For this country, the war was over, yet hostilities resumed just
two years later when the North Vietnamese launched an all-out invasion of
the South.

The documentary "Last Days in Vietnam" by award-winning filmmaker Rory
Kennedy is about those final weeks before the fall of Saigon and it`s just
been nominated for an Academy Award. The film tells the courageous story
of the American personnel who against direct orders from the White House
decided to save as many of their South Vietnamese allies as they could.

And here`s a clip from the trailer.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The final battle of Saigon has begun.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: That morning, there must have been at least 10,000
people ringing the embassy.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There was a sea of people wanting to get out.
They looked up at the helicopters leaving, and I could see their eyes,
desperate eyes.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There are no words to describe what a ship looks
like that holds 200 and it has got 2,000 on it.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We have no more helicopters. That`s it.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: As it took off, I could see the group right where
we had left them. It was just so serious and deep a betrayal.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Who goes? And who gets left behind?


MATTHEWS: Joining me right now is Rory Kennedy, director of the
Academy Award-nominated film "Last Days in Vietnam."

Rory, congratulations for the nomination.

I guess the heart of this is something we didn`t know about, which is
that these American guys and women decided to break rules and say, look,
we`re going to defend our allies, we`re going to try to get them out of

part of the story that really excited me, and because I do think it`s
revelatory for many people watching it.

I think you know, Vietnam, when we think about Vietnam, it was a very
dark moment in our nation`s history, you know, and certainly true for South
Vietnam. And I think to know that there were heroes during this time, both
South Vietnamese and Americans who risked their lives, who did everything
they could to save as many Vietnamese as possible, is a story that we just
don`t know.

And there are real heroes that come out of this moment, who just did
the most exceptional things.

MATTHEWS: What was the fate of the people that didn`t get on the

KENNEDY: Well, you know, of course, I think that the desperation that
you saw in those images was based on a fear that the South Vietnamese had
about what would happen to them.

And, indeed, many of them were tortured. They were killed. Many of
them spent years in reeducation camps, which was basically hard labor. So,
you know, there was real struggle for those who were left behind. There`s
a man in our film, Dan Pham (ph), who worked with the Americans. He was
promised that we would get him out if there was a need. He wasn`t able to
get out during those last days, and he ended up spending 13 years in a
reeducation camp.

And I think, you know, stories like that are enormously valuable, and
I think they`re important for us to remember as a nation when we have these
wars, when we engage in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, what is our
responsibility to the people who are left behind, who are our allies, who
worked with us?

We leave. We left Vietnam, but then the Dan Phams (ph) of the world
spend 13 years reeducation camps.

MATTHEWS: Well said. I keep thinking about the interpreters over
there, so many thousands of interpreters in the wars in Afghanistan and
Iraq who are sitting in a very bad situation when we leave it.


MATTHEWS: Yes, go ahead.

KENNEDY: They`re begging to come to our country and they worked so
closely with us, and, you know, they gave everything to us.

And I think that we do have a responsibility to our allies and to our

MATTHEWS: Well, facing the possibility of death at the hands of the
North Vietnamese, the citizens fleeing from South Vietnam were so desperate
that they often took great risk to escape.

Here`s a clip from the film showing the last flight out of Da Nang, as
the communists took over the city.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Our plane is surrounded here. I don`t know how
the hell we`re going to get out. We`re racing down the runway, leaving
behind hundreds and thousands of people.

About a dozen of them running along, grabbing at the air stair. We`re
pulling them on as fast as we can. There`s a sea of humanity jamming on.
Impossible to stop the crowd. We`re pulling away. We`re leaving them
behind. We`re pulling up with the -- people are falling off the air
stairs. The plane is taking off.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It was every man for himself.


MATTHEWS: So, what`s the lesson? I guess that`s too big a question,
but it`s about loyalty to allies, I guess.

KENNEDY: Well, that`s part of -- that`s part of the lesson.

I think, you know, part of the lesson for me is, these stories of the
men who are on the ground, who did the right thing, and it`s in this face
and this wave of history that is moving against them and heading in such a
terrible direction, where we`re abandoning our allies, and where people are
going to be left to be tortured and killed.

And in the face of that, the people on the ground did the right thing.
And I think there`s such an inspiration and such a great message there
about trying to be the best that we can be. You know, imagine if -- you
know, we look at these disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan, if we want to see
them as disasters, and difficult situations, if we as a country said, let`s
be the best that we can be in these instances, let`s do the best that we
can, give in where we are in time and place right now.

MATTHEWS: So well said.

KENNEDY: And I think that`s -- I think that`s a valuable lesson. And
these folks, you know, can remind us of what our potential is, really.

MATTHEWS: Rory, I think we`re going to hear a lot from you in years
to come.

Rory Kennedy, a great person, thanks so much for this great -- good
luck in the Oscars.

KENNEDY: Thanks.

MATTHEWS: They`re not as important as the story, but good luck.

KENNEDY: That`s true. Thanks, Chris.

MATTHEWS: Up next, the far-right freak-out over President Obama`s
speech at the National Prayer Breakfast.

You`re watching HARDBALL, the place for politics.


Here`s what`s happening.

French President Francois Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel
met with Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier to try and advance peace
talks to end the violence in Ukraine.

Meanwhile, in Brussels, Vice President Biden says Ukraine is fighting
for its survival, as Russia continues to escalate the conflict in the
country`s east.

And health insurer Anthem is warning consumers about phishing scams
targeting customers after a recent hacking. The personal information of
about 80 million people was compromised -- back to HARDBALL.

MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.

Well, conservatives out there are red hot, outraged, you might say,
over President Obama and remarks he made just yesterday at the thing called
the National Prayer Breakfast. The president denounced violent extremism
in his remarks and also challenged Americans to reflect on Christianity`s
own history with violence. Here he is.


being twisted and distorted, used as a wedge, or worse, sometimes used as a

We see ISIL, a brutal, vicious death cult that, in the name of
religion, carries out unspeakable acts of barbarism. And humanity has been
grappling with these questions throughout human history.

Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other
place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people
committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country,
slavery and Jim Crow, all too often was justified in the name of Christ.


MATTHEWS: Well, it didn`t take long for those on the hard right to
pounce on the president slamming him for drawing a moral equivalency
between Christianity and Islamic terrorists. Former Pennsylvania
Republican Senator and 2012 presidential candidate Rick Santorum, of
course, said today`s remarks by the president were inappropriate and his
choice of venue was insulting to every person of faith at a time when
Christians are being crucified, beheaded and persecuted across the Middle

And former Virginia Governor Jim Gilmore said, quote, "The president`s
comments this morning at the prayer breakfast are the most offensive I`ve
ever heard a president make in my lifetime. He has offended every
believing Christian in the United States. This goes further to the point
that Mr. Obama does not believe in America or the values we all share."

For more I`m joined by tonight`s roundtable: Clarence Page is a
columnist for "The Chicago Tribune", April Ryan is a White House
correspondent for American Urban Radio Networks and author of the brave new
book, "The Presidency in Black and White". We`re going to talk about that
in just a minute. And David Corn is an MSNBC political analyst and
Washington bureau chief of "Mother Jones".

I want to give April a lot of time in a minute. But I`m going to
start with you.

David, I thought it was extraordinary the president reached back 1,000
years to the Crusades and talked about the evil the of the Crusades, which
were beyond anything ISIS has ever done, thousands and thousands killed in
Hungary, killed in Turkey. I mean, nobody can believe. We didn`t learn
this from watching Disney movies.


MATTHEWS: The amount of people killed by the Crusades had nothing to
do with restoring the holy lands.

CORN: Well, yes, but it wasn`t just the Crusades. He also talked
about slavery and even more recently, Jim Crow, all justified by some, not
by all, on the basis of Christianity and belief in God, that, you know, the
Bible says that Abel has mark of Cain, and that stuff, and they use
Christianity to justify these things.

I think his only point here is that before you start saying that
radical Islam is something different and using it t it -- realize that
every major religion has had its time period where it`s been distorted and
used by a certain set of small extremists to violent ends.


CORN: And it all comes after a week or two of this new conservative
talking point that the president won`t call them radical Islamists, that he
says they`re terrorists, jihadist, extremists, and the right wants to call
them Islamist, they want to tie religion to the terror.

MATTHEWS: But the Crusades in all fairness weren`t launched by a
bunch of outriders. They were lead by Urban II, but by the largest -- the
Christian church of 11th century.



MATTHEWS: You say it`s horrible but they were definitely religious.

PAGE: The argument is that religion is used to justify great
violence, long the order of that, which we`ve seen with ISIS. That was the
point, and he also mentioned the Spanish Inquisition. I mean, he bought in
old manner --

MATTHEWS: But it was clearly a Christian act. It wasn`t by

PAGE: It was only within our lifetime, Chris, that the Southern
Baptist Convention apologized for arguing in favor of slavery, justifying
it with the Bible for several hundred years.

MATTHEWS: So, it is moral equivalency.

CORN: No, no, it`s not --


PAGE: What do you mean moral equivalence?

MATTHEWS: All religions are bad.

PAGE: Not bad. Let`s try not to be so polarizing. Let`s try to use
some nuance because the fact is, religion is used to justify evil quite
often. And it shouldn`t be, and that was Obama`s point.

But the main thing, Obama is in his last two years in office. He is
saying what he really thinks now. He`s obviously tired of people trying to
demonize Islam as if they`re terrible and all Christians are wonderful.

MATTHEWS: I am with him. Anyway you guys, see how I did a bear-
baiting with the chair?


MATTHEWS: I think April`s great to husband her time here. Rush
Limbaugh also joined the chorus of those who accused President Obama of
insulting Christians and downplaying militant Islam. But Limbaugh took it
even further, saying Obama has a problem with our country. Here he is.


RUSH LIMBAUGH, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: I think this national prayer
breakfast kind of dots the I, crosses the T on all this.

We have a guy, a man who really has a problem with this country, has a
problem with this nation`s founding. He has a deep-seated problem with
this nation`s existence. He doesn`t like the fact that we`re a super
power, thinks it`s not been honestly earned.


MATTHEWS: Well, I thought that the walrus was smart here to avoid the
religious issue.

Did you notice? I call him the walrus, underwater. He talks about
(INAUDIBLE). You know, he didn`t talk about religion because he knows that
would be too hypocritical.


PAGE: Talk about holier than thou.

Republicans are trying to find their way now. It`s all about 2016. And I
think they are trying to pounce on anything they can and the White House
knows patriotism, race and religion, one of the hot buttons that set them
off. For Rush Limbaugh, for Bing Carson, who likes to jump on statements
at any time to make himself relevant for the moment, that`s all that this
is about.

CORN: Can I disagree with my good friend a second?

RYAN: Thank you.

CORN: I agree -- I mean, I agree with that point, but I don`t think
it`s just about 2016. I think we`ve talked about this numerous times.
There`s been a campaign from the very beginning to depict Barack Obama as
the other. Someone who`s not really American, he doesn`t believe in
American --

RYAN: As Rush Limbaugh said, he doesn`t care about this country, and
the founding. What does that mean?


CORN: That he`s a secret Muslim, wasn`t born here plays into this.
It`s at the core of Obama --


MATTHEWS: OK, if you`re in the party, the Republican Party, and
you`re getting smaller number compared to other people, Democrats.
Minorities, OK, what do you got to do? You go to outspend them? You get
all the rules changed and you`re going to spend them, right?

CORN: Yes. And they --

MATTHEWS: You got to do that. What else you have to do? Make sure
they don`t get to vote? What else to do? Make sure they don`t.

And there, claim god.

Anyway, the roundtable is staying with us. We`re up next.


MATTHEWS: Well, the January jobs report was out today and show as
major boost in job growth -- 257,000 jobs were added in January, and the
unemployment rate ticked up to 5.7, but that`s because more people were
looking to reenter the workforce. All good news. Today`s report follows
two strong months of job gains, making a three-month stretch the biggest
boom in labor market growth in 17 years. Things are looking up.

We`ll be right back.


MATTHEWS: We`re back with the roundtable, April, Clarence and David.

You know, April is author of the, that`s April her, not April the
month, a new book, "The Presidency in Black and White." She`s talking
about Obama and other presidents she`s covered. In it, she looks at the
last three presidents of the United States and how they dealt with the
issue of race.

Well, this week the subject was in the news again, thanks to a leaked
excerpts of a new book by former Obama advisor David Axelrod. One anecdote
in particular about the concession call that Mitt Romney made to President
Obama on election night in `12. It has gotten a lot of attention.

According to "The Daily News", Obama was, quote, "unsmiling during the
call and slightly irritated when it was over. The president Hung up and
said Romney admitted he was surprised at his own loss. Quote, `You really
did a great job getting the vote out of places like Cleveland and
Milwaukee, in other wards, black people`, Obama said, paraphrasing Romney.
That`s what he thinks this was all about."

Anyway, for the record, Mitt Romney`s body man disputed Axelrod`s
characterization, but wouldn`t he?

OK, let`s go right now. April, the president has a thin skin about
winning with the black charge -- oh, he`s just won with the black majority.
He got out the vote in the big city. That`s why he won. America didn`t
choose him.

RYAN: America did choose him. It was a large part of America that
chose him. Yes, African-Americans, women, as well as LBGT, and other
people, and whites as well. Yes, he got a large majority of African-
Americans in the 90 percentile range.

But you had to remember, this president had to navigate the waters
successfully the first term. He did not ever want to amplify the issue of
race because that is already there. Politics and race will always follow

But for that issue to be chided by Mitt Romney to talk to him about
that, how dare he? This president was very tactful in how to navigate the
waters on race. And for him to feel like Mitt Romney, the man who was the
white male president, to talk to him about race, how dare you? That`s the
president, that is the president.

MATTHEWS: I was thinking, Clarence, the first debate, when I thought
Mitt Romney looked down on him as a man, like I`m better than you, I`m
whatever white, I`m rich Mormon, I`m a business guy, I`m Ivy League, I`m
prep school, in every way, I`m superior to you. And it really bugged me
because it worked. It seems to intimidate Obama like with, OK, with that
kind of cock-sure arrogance, you`re going to get away with a debate win
this time and I`m coming back.

PAGE: I thought it was just the opposite. I thought Obama was
overconfident in that first debate. And afterwards, when he looked at the
tape Axelrod showed him, they said, I was pretty bad, wasn`t I?


PAGE: Not just you, but a lot of people were jumping up and down like
crazy people, but part of that is Romney, too, though. One of his deficits
is he can`t help but look arrogant sometimes.

MATTHEWS: Yes, but it worked that night.

PAGE: And blah, blah, blah.

MATTHEWS: Anyway, to call the guy up and say, you won because you
brought the black areas in, he`s exactly what Cronkite said to Kennedy,
that night he won the Wisconsin primary, sure he won because of Catholic
areas. Can they win through the roof? He said, now we`ve got to West
Virginia. You have taken away my victory.

Go ahead.

CORN: Well, it is condescending, and after the election there was a
conference call with Mitt Romney and some funders and they got reported at
the time, in which he essentially said Obama won because he promised things
to certain voters.


CORN: Again, the 47 percent, the black --

MATTHEWS: He bought the black vote.

CORN: He bought the black vote, and the Latino vote and everything
else. And again, it`s like he sort of did this unfairly, and he`s really
not -- it goes back to what we`re talking about the previous segment, he is
not a true American, he`s not a true American leader, he doesn`t bring the
country together.


MATTHEWS: We can`t do everything on the show. But your book can do
everything (ph). This weekend, if someone went to Amazon or go to a

RYAN: Barnes and Nobles, any bookstore, --

MATTHEWS: What does it say? Let`s try it. What does it say to the
general public?

RYAN: What does it say to the general public? It`s is a personal and
political stories that takes the veil off of the White House. It takes the
mystery off. We`re talking about Mitt Romney. There is a story in here
about how Mitt Romney brought together black reporters in Frankenmuth,
Michigan, and I was one of the reporters, and I asked him a question about
black unemployment rate, and you know what he said? I don`t understand. I
was not speaking a foreign language or Ebonics, I was speaking clearly, and
he didn`t understand.

MATTHEWS: Understand what, a question about what`s the story on black

RYAN: Yes, how is he going to bring it down? So, it was very
interesting. We`ve got a lot of stories.

CORN: There is a great Bill Clinton story.

RYAN: Great Bill Clinton --

CORN: The whole issue about whether they --

MATTHEWS: Does your book say anything good about W.?

RYAN: Yes, it does.


RYAN: PEPFAR, Africa, yes. He was the president known to have done
the most for Africa. But he did get an F for Katrina, because people were
disenfranchised and they died.

MATTHEWS: He should have showed up with water bottles and stood there
handing them out.

CORN: Yes.

MATTHEWS: It would have helped, like LBJ would have done. In fact,
LBJ did do it once.

Anyway, thank you, Clarence Page.

Good luck, April Ryan. The name of the book again?

RYAN: "The Presidency in Black and White."

MATTHEWS: OK, I really like to help you with books.

Clarence, what`s the name of your most recent --

PAGE: "Culture Warrior."

MATTHEWS: "Culture Warrior", warrior, "Culture Warrior", get yourself
a book.

We`ll be right back after this.


MATTHEWS: Let me finish tonight with a sad rush to placate the
enemies of science.

Chris Christie gives a merry-go-round answer to Kasie Hunt`s question
about whether states should require vaccinations for school children.
There he goes round and round trying to tag all the bases and make sure he
doesn`t look like he`s too modern, too moderate, or even too educated.
Can`t do that.

Bobby Jindal, who once praised his state`s adoption of Common Core
education standards now talks about empowering parents to fight them.

Rand Paul meanwhile just said that vaccinations cause mental problems
and then says he never said. Well, he did. Everyone sees this scared,
desperate politicians trying to avoid controversy. You see them struggle
to protect themselves from what`s become the mortal sin of current
politics, showing any evidence of personal conviction.

You see, the game here is not say what you think and make a case for
it. It`s not to show you have spine. No, the game here, being
demonstrated so well by a trio of tap dancers, is to display your jelly
like ability to speak without conviction, to think only enough to navigate
your way around the truth, to take pride not near fidelity to principle,
but in your agility, your ability to stroll right up to the presidency by
following a safe and therefore well-tried path of others before you.

How can you add hire politicians who lack the basic human instinct to
say what they believe?

That`s HARDBALL for now. Thanks for being with us.

"ALL IN WITH CHRIS HAYES" starts right now.


Copyright 2015 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by
United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written
permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark,
copyright or other notice from copies of the content.>