IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Court lets ex-Royal Ahold execs off with a fine

A court found the former chief executive and chief financial officer of Dutch retailer Royal Ahold NV guilty of fraud Monday, but ruled the pair will not have to serve prison time.
/ Source: The Associated Press

The executives in charge as Dutch retailer Royal Ahold NV plunged into one of Europe’s worst financial scandals were convicted of fraud Monday but let off with a fine and no prison time, as judges found they bore little criminal guilt.

The court fined former CEO Cees van der Hoeven and former CFO Michiel Meurs 225,000 euros ($290,000) each and gave them both nine-month suspended sentences.

The verdict comes more than three years after Ahold — known for operating grocery stores around the world, including the Stop & Shop and Giant chains in the United States — went to the brink of bankruptcy in February 2003.

Van der Hoeven and Meurs resigned then, saying the company’s earnings reports from 1999-2002 were not reliable. Ahold shares lost two-thirds of their value overnight and it eventually emerged the company had overstated earnings by more than 1 billion euros in 1999-2002, mostly by inflating sales at its U.S. Foodservice Inc. subsidiary.

The Dutch judgment Monday covered a different, smaller part of the scandal — Ahold’s claims to investors it had control of companies in Brazil, Argentina and Scandinavia when it only owned 50 percent of them and control was in dispute.

Consolidating such companies in earnings reports was legal under Dutch rules then in place, though not according to generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. or new international rules that went into effect at the start of 2006.

Because the men were not personally enriched by the fraud, Presiding Judge Frans Bauduin said comparisons between Ahold and Enron Corp. or Italy’s Parmalat SpA were “wrong in all respects.”

However, the men “greatly damaged the trust that their employees, customers, investors, board of supervisors and accountants placed in them,” Bauduin said.

“What a disappointment,” Peter de Vries, head of the Dutch shareholders’ organization VEB, said in a written reaction. He called the fines a “pittance,” given that Van der Hoeven is estimated to have 43 million euros ($55 million) in personal wealth.

“This judgment sends a signal to managers that no matter what they do, the risk of a heavy punishment is minimal,” he said. “In the United States, a conviction on the same facts would have led to a prison term of more than 10 years. This is Holland at its smallest.”

Prosecutors, who had asked for 14-month prison terms, said they will appeal the ruling.

Van der Hoeven said he was disappointed with the verdict and he would also appeal. But “it’s been a purifying experience,” he said. “I’ve learned from it.”

In the biggest part of the Ahold affair — the exaggeration of sales at its U.S. Foodservice subsidiary — the same men reached a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in which they admitted no guilt but accepted a lifetime ban from holding office in a publicly traded company. The SEC said the case was “deplorable,” but the U.S. did not undertake a criminal prosecution of the men to avoid double-jeopardy issues in the Dutch case.

U.S. Foodservice’s former CFO Michael Resnick and former marketing head Mark Kaiser are awaiting trial in the United States. Former Chief Executive Jim Miller has not been charged.

In the Dutch that concluded Monday, Van der Hoeven and Meurs were accused of improperly booking sales from the four foreign subsidiaries even though control of the businesses was in dispute.

In public documents, Ahold said it had 50 percent and a controlling stake in the companies. But prosecutors said the issue of control was unresolved, as evidenced by several nonpublic “side letters” between Ahold managers and the subsidiaries’ other owners.

Meurs argued he didn’t believe the side letters were significant enough to mention publicly, given that they didn’t have an impact on the company’s bottom line.

Bauduin said that excuse wasn’t valid, since Meurs knew that investors also judge a company on the basis of its assets, which are worth more when a company has full control of them.

Van der Hoeven said he didn’t know about the letters, but Bauduin said that was “not credible” given that he signed his name on one.

Another suspect in the Dutch case, Jan Andreae, the company’s former manager for European activities, was fined 120,000 euros ($150,000) and given a four-month suspended sentence. The fourth, Roland Fahlin, a former Ahold board member who was chairman of the company’s bookkeeping committee, was acquitted.

Ahold, under new management, was not involved in Monday’s suit and is well on the way to recovery from the scandal. It avoided U.S. prosecution by cooperating with the SEC and promising to reform. It received a formal reprimand from the Dutch financial watchdog AFM, and settled with Dutch prosecutors for 8 million euros ($9.6 million).

In November, the company agreed to pay $1.1 billion to settle shareholder lawsuits.